| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. Mom 'n' Pop Sweat Shoppe now OPEN! ** R.E.P.O. Alliance recruitment ** - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Are you up late looking at corp recruitment threads? We're up late shooting stuff! You could be too!
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2013.10.05 04:59:00
|
2. Mom 'n' Pop Sweat Shoppe now OPEN! ** R.E.P.O. Alliance recruitment ** - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Come check us out. We'd love to hear from you. Lots of action and lots of fun.
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2013.10.03 18:57:00
|
3. Why Hilmar is right and why it doesn't really matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Scerolikk Teromni You don't fu cking get it. You don't buy ISK with PLEX, you sell PLEX for ISK. You don't create new ISK from PLEX, you are given ISK from another player for PLEX and that player subsequently has an equal...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.27 01:37:00
|
4. Why Hilmar is right and why it doesn't really matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Marcus Grisbius on 27/06/2011 00:45:17 Originally by: Hekira Soikutsu Buying modules. If it is as you say and nothing is changed by having modules sold on NeX, why even have the option to do so at all? High meta level items ...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.27 00:41:00
|
5. Why Hilmar is right and why it doesn't really matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Siale Achthe Originally by: Marcus Grisbius they [cc] have for nearly 10 years put out free expansions. They have added content, added staff, grown an online community and business and ultimately created a healthy b...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.27 00:33:00
|
6. Why Hilmar is right and why it doesn't really matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I disagree with your idea of the end product and the point of the memo/email/newsletters. I don't think that anything has changed in reality compared to 2 weeks ago ingame. The end result is an easier way of enjoying the game you had before Incarn...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.27 00:07:00
|
7. Why Hilmar is right and why it doesn't really matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
However, we should want new players to be attracted to the game and to be able to participate in a serious and concrete way. In order to accomplish this and to create an interface with the upcoming Dust release, Incarna was a necessity. Is it perf...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.26 23:59:00
|
8. Why Hilmar is right and why it doesn't really matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Items/modules/implants/etc. - It would be ludicrous to believe that people who sell PLEX on the market are not using that ISK to purchase modules and ships of all varieties. There are also no limitations on how much ISK can be bought through PL...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.26 23:56:00
|
9. Why Hilmar is right and why it doesn't really matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
First off, I would like to say that I have played this game for going on 8 years. I was here since nearly launch and I have played continuously for all but a couple months for the birth of my 2 kids. I have played and done just about everything in...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.26 23:52:00
|
10. ECM team is unbeatable - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
If eccm is the only counter to an ecm fleet you can think of then there hasn't been a lot of thinking about it. Besides eccm can be very effective when used right. By that same reasoning, using armor hardeners is gimping a setup because you can't ...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.12 22:48:00
|
11. Pre Qualifying 2 - Team Rankings are up. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
No, ronin stood no chance of advancing because the got shut out the first round. Had the other team shown up with 30 points they would still have no chance. They would not be penalized if they were trying to risk something. It's a risk that accord...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.07 16:08:00
|
12. 28th Position - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Then what is the purpose for the unfielded ship rule? That is supposed to be the counter to the ships killed points in case the team fields fewer or in this case no points. There is no difference in fielding a destroyer and not showing up. The opp...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.07 15:28:00
|
13. 28th Position - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I think it's quite obvious that ccp has no concept of the unfielded ship rule. Any unfielded points go to the opponent. Winner or loser no questions asked. That should clear up any issues with people not showing up. Ronin should have scored 62.5 a...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.06 17:09:00
|
14. Pre Qualifying 2 - Team Rankings are up. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Wow I think this may be the first time a team advances without killing a single ship. So far this tournament isn't living up to the hype. Too much confusion on rules, organization and execution. Also it's getting kinda repetitive seeing minmatar f...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.06 06:13:00
|
15. Pre Qualifying 1 - Team Rankings are up. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Marcus Grisbius on 03/06/2011 05:04:31 Edited by: Marcus Grisbius on 03/06/2011 05:01:39 Originally by: Takakura Hirohito Originally by: Marcus Grisbius Quote: Yes, can CCP answer this? Clockwork really s...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.03 05:00:00
|
16. Pre Qualifying 1 - Team Rankings are up. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Yes, can CCP answer this? Clockwork really should have 1 point given RAZOR only had 49 points on the field. The rule seems very vague and if it is for just the winner, perhaps ccp should make that clearer. CCP, a response, of an...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.03 02:47:00
|
17. Pre Qualifying 1 - Team Rankings are up. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
That¦s the way that others have interpreted the rules when setting up unofficial spreadsheets too. It¦s a little annoying that as teams we spend a ton of time going over the rules to make sure we¦re in compliance and planning, but CCP don¦t seem t...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.01 14:15:00
|
18. Pre Qualifying 1 - Team Rankings are up. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Thank you for your reply. I just wish it didn't take whining on the forum to get an answer or even be acknowledged. I can understand the common sense of it. As it's stated though, it's not clear that it's only for the winner. And we could use a po...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.06.01 02:41:00
|
19. Pre Qualifying 1 - Team Rankings are up. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
How do I get an answer from the CCP folk here? I¦ve repeated my question several times during this thread and devs have been watching and reading apparently everyone else¦s posts but not mine. There have been several different posts from devs but ...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.05.31 23:16:00
|
20. Alliance Tournament IX, Nothing there for the Industrialists. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
There was a tournament several years ago for miner types. It was the least popular and worst attended tournament iirc. I'm sure some of the other old timers could probably tell you about it but they're more than likely trying to block out that mem...
- by Marcus Grisbius - at 2011.05.31 17:59:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |